We seem to be talking across one another instead of to one anotherI understand your arguments, i do. But based on the way you present them to me gives me the idea you misinterpret
My counterarguments. This does not make you wrong and me right or vice versa. Or maybe it is my English that has not developed to the requirred level for these discussions
I thinm
- - - Updated - - -
Thank you.. not to be the proud wise guy here, but this argument
More or less sums up what i meant by human inventions versus the undenyable facts.
I think the same applies to the "laws"
of physics. I could say that "laws" are non existent becouse we gave it that name![]()
I guess i have to admit i took it a little bit to far making me prone to make a mistake or 2
- - - Updated - - -
I wanted to quote this instead of Protoss awnser to it
A little part that i kept emhpasizing on was the name we give to factual principles to make sense to us for our benificial understanding.